In this passage, do we find a recipe to be followed
step-by-step, or do we add ingredients to the mixing bowl at different
intervals and in varying amounts according to our individual personalities and
experiences?
In the “step-by-step” camp, here are two samples of what others
had to say:
· “Each
of these several steps begets and facilitates the next.”*
·
“The
believer’s way is marked out step by step."*
Plus, here is one who wanted it both ways: “The different virtues here are not
arranged according to definite logical order,” but, he says, “Each of the
virtues . . . forms the complement of that which precedes.”*
Of the writers who agreed with me that this
recipe is somewhat more random, this approach is my favorite: “This is to be seen not so much as a progression but as
an expansion (you do not start with faith and gradually build up to love,
rather, as you truly believe, your life expands to take it all in).*
I believe it is safe to say that when Peter
writes about possessing these qualities in “increasing measure,” he doesn’t expect
us ever to reach saturation point, only to keep adding ingredients. As someone
else expressed it, “These beautiful qualities
are not things that the Lord simply pours into us as we passively receive.
Instead, we are called to give all diligence to these things, working in partnership with God to add them.”*
What about the
benefit of our diligence? Were you as surprised as I was that Peter says that
we will be effective and productive in our knowledge
of Jesus, rather than in some activity
for Jesus? Knowledge seems such a passive attribute. Shouldn’t effectiveness
and fruitfulness be the result of heroic service? We need to understand that
full knowledge of Jesus is not the same as knowing the multiplication table or
the state capitols. To know Christ is to know his will, and it is not his will
for us to remain inadequate and barren.
|